Professional Regulation

Most professionals are required to abide by laws, regulations and rules affecting their practice.

As a professional, you rely on your reputation to sustain the career you’ve built. Administrative law issues such as certification problems, complaints or investigations can put that reputation in peril, impeding work and affecting your livelihood.

Professionals often grapple with serious ethical issues – issues that can become problems that threaten their reputations, security and practices. We have helped clients with almost every type of regulatory issue.

We defend individuals and work with liability insurers, professional associations and organizations to determine the best options.

Did you know that Harper Grey publishes the Canadian Administrative Law Blog?  Stay current with new case law and emerging issues – read more here.

Learn More

Professional Regulation Services

  • Providing advice regarding investigations and inquiries by administrative authorities.
  • Advocating for clients before administrative tribunals such as the Health Professions Review Board.
  • Representing clients in Judicial Review matters.
  • Appealing the decisions of administrative bodies.
  • Advising professional organizations regarding liability insurance programs, communication to members and responses to new rules and regulations.
  • Constitutional and Charter challenges.
  • Defamation, libel, slander and breach of trust matters.

  • Advising clients regarding billing audits by the Medical Services Commission, insurance companies and other organizations.
  • Human rights complaints and representation before the Human Rights Tribunal.
  • Privacy and matters relating to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act.
  • Helping clients with issues relating to government and public bodies.
  • Professional errors and omissions insurance claims.
  • Workers Compensation Board issues.
  • Reinstatement of professional practice applications.

Featured Partners

William S. Clark* Partner
Michael Hewitt* Partner
Kimberly J. Jakeman, KC* Partner
Scott J. Marcinkow* Partner
Jonathan D. Meadows* Managing Partner
Joel A. Morris* Partner
Raj Samtani* Partner
W. Sean Taylor Partner
Nigel Trevethan* Partner
Lara C. Zee Partner
All practice group members arrow icon

Scenarios

A pharmacist is under investigation after she fills a script incorrectly, causing a patient to experience heart palpitations and a visit to the emergency room.

The College of Dental Surgeons audits the billing practices of a dental clinic and finds out that the office manager has misappropriated funds.

A teacher transferring from another province is denied a Certificate of Qualification. He applies for Judicial Review of the decision.

Harper Grey recognized as "Consistently Recommended" in the area of Professional Liability by Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory®, 2024

Select Cases

Investigations and disciplinary hearings by securities regulatory authorities

Representing broker dealers, registered representatives and traders in investigations and disciplinary hearings by securities regulatory authorities including the BC Securities Commission, the Investment Dealers Association and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association.

Forest practice matters

Representing clients in disputes involving forest practice matters.

Wildlife management matters

Representing clients in wildlife management matters involving the Environmental Appeal Board.

Representing health care professionals

Representing health care professionals in disputes with the Medical Services Commission related to billing audits and the recovery of alleged over-payments to health professions.

Providing policy advice to professionals and organizations

Providing policy advice to professionals and organizations on matters including privacy legislation, the scope of and proposed amendments to the Health Professions Act, the role of mediation in professional regulation, the drafting of by-laws and ethical standards.

Appealing disciplinary decisions

Appealing disciplinary decisions including matters considered by the Supreme Court of Canada, such as Dr. Q. v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia.

Scope of judicial review

Acting as counsel in many court decisions related to the scope of judicial review and appeals from administrative tribunals such as the Health Professions Review Board.

Representing professionals before their governing body in disciplinary matters

Including allegations of negligence, sexual misconduct, improper prescribing of medication, breach of confidentiality and incompetence.

arrow icon
Need a Lawyer?
Get in touch with our professional regulation team.

The Latest

“In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority
“In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority “In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority
Rachel Wood joins Harper Grey as an Associate
Rachel Wood joins Harper Grey as an Associate Rachel Wood joins Harper Grey as an Associate
Harper Grey Professional Regulation Group recognized as “Consistently Recommended” by 2024 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory
Harper Grey Professional Regulation Group recognized as “Consistently Recommended” by 2024 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory
2024 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory recognizes Harper Grey as a leading law firm in 6 practice areas in Vancouver
2024 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory recognizes Harper Grey as a leading law firm in 6 practice areas in Vancouver
22 Harper Grey lawyers recognized as “Leading Practitioners” by Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory 2024
22 Harper Grey lawyers recognized as “Leading Practitioners” by Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory 2024
An individual board member may disclose confidential board information to their own lawyer on matters affecting them personally
An individual board member may disclose confidential board information to their own lawyer on matters affecting them personally An individual board member may disclose confidential board information to their own lawyer on matters affecting them personally
Judicial Review is not a venue for vindication
Judicial Review is not a venue for vindication Judicial Review is not a venue for vindication
Veterinarian guilty of unprofessional conduct for non-compliant hydromorphone use
Veterinarian guilty of unprofessional conduct for non-compliant hydromorphone use Veterinarian guilty of unprofessional conduct for non-compliant hydromorphone use
A party may raise a procedural fairness issue for the first time on judicial review where that party could not reasonably have identified and raised the issue before the original decision-maker
A party may raise a procedural fairness issue for the first time on judicial review where that party could not reasonably have identified and raised the issue before the original decision-maker A party may raise a procedural fairness issue for the first time on judicial review where that party could not reasonably have identified and raised the issue before the original decision-maker
The next time Vancouver’s Fire Chief seeks to remove the shelters the occupants of Hastings Block erect, procedural fairness demands that notice of this plan and an opportunity for the occupants to provide submissions to the Fire Chief must be provided
The next time Vancouver’s Fire Chief seeks to remove the shelters the occupants of Hastings Block erect, procedural fairness demands that notice of this plan and an opportunity for the occupants to provide submissions to the Fire Chief must be provided The next time Vancouver’s Fire Chief seeks to remove the shelters the occupants of Hastings Block erect, procedural fairness demands that notice of this plan and an opportunity for the occupants to provide submissions to the Fire Chief must be provided
Ontario Superior Court of Justice finds School Board appropriately balanced public member’s Charter right to freedom of expression with its bylaws in its decision to prevent further presentation on topics that it deemed could violate human rights legislation and its policies
Ontario Superior Court of Justice finds School Board appropriately balanced public member’s Charter right to freedom of expression with its bylaws in its decision to prevent further presentation on topics that it deemed could violate human rights legislation and its policies Ontario Superior Court of Justice finds School Board appropriately balanced public member’s Charter right to freedom of expression with its bylaws in its decision to prevent further presentation on topics that it deemed could violate human rights legislation and its policies
Utilities Commission breached its duty of procedural fairness when making a significant policy change without adequate notice of that potential change
Utilities Commission breached its duty of procedural fairness when making a significant policy change without adequate notice of that potential change Utilities Commission breached its duty of procedural fairness when making a significant policy change without adequate notice of that potential change
No breach of procedural fairness where a lawyer had an opportunity to provide submissions on costs, but did not do so
No breach of procedural fairness where a lawyer had an opportunity to provide submissions on costs, but did not do so No breach of procedural fairness where a lawyer had an opportunity to provide submissions on costs, but did not do so
Fishing association did not have standing to advance argument that Minister of Fisheries and Oceans breached its constitutional duty to consult with Indigenous stakeholders before making decision to geographically divide a lobster fishing area in Atlantic Ocean
Fishing association did not have standing to advance argument that Minister of Fisheries and Oceans breached its constitutional duty to consult with Indigenous stakeholders before making decision to geographically divide a lobster fishing area in Atlantic Ocean Fishing association did not have standing to advance argument that Minister of Fisheries and Oceans breached its constitutional duty to consult with Indigenous stakeholders before making decision to geographically divide a lobster fishing area in Atlantic Ocean
Federal Court of Appeal upholds Federal Employment Board’s dismissal of a complaint that alleged abuse of authority in an internal appointment process
Federal Court of Appeal upholds Federal Employment Board’s dismissal of a complaint that alleged abuse of authority in an internal appointment process Federal Court of Appeal upholds Federal Employment Board’s dismissal of a complaint that alleged abuse of authority in an internal appointment process
arrow icon