Alicia Catalano

Associate

She/Her

Alicia is a civil litigator with a practice focused on health and insurance law.

Biography

Alicia assists insurance clients with a variety of litigation defence matters, handling an array of cases involving bodily injury and property loss. She has a particular interest in bodily injury defence and has represented a wide range of clients including homeowners, restaurant chains, retail businesses, grocery stores, and small businesses. She also represents manufacturers and distributors in product liability cases.

In her health law practice, Alicia represents physicians in both regulatory and civil litigation matters.

Alicia has appeared before the British Columbia Provincial Court and BC Supreme Court. She also has experience assisting clients with matters before the Civil Resolution Tribunal.

Alicia is a contributor to the Harper Grey Insurance Netletter.

Having both summered and articled at Harper Grey, Alicia has spent the tenure of her legal career at the Firm.

Assistance Team
Legal Administrative Assistant

Shane Ng

Legal Administrative Assistant

[email protected] Contact by email
Expertise
Education
  • Thompson Rivers University, J.D., 2019

  • Capilano University, B.A., 2014

Bar Admission
  • British Columbia, 2020
Languages spoken
  • English
Professional Credentials
Memberships
  • Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch, Member
  • Law Society of British Columbia, Member
  • Medical Legal Society, Member

Get in touch with

Alicia Catalano

The Latest

Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy
Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault
Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault
Insured entitled to indemnification by insurer due to Court interpreting policy contra proferentem against insurer
Insured entitled to indemnification by insurer due to Court interpreting policy contra proferentem against insurer Insured entitled to indemnification by insurer due to Court interpreting policy contra proferentem against insurer
Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation
Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation
Harper Grey hosts Spring 2022 Virtual Insurance Law Seminar
Harper Grey hosts Spring 2022 Virtual Insurance Law Seminar
Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding
Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding
Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial
Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial
Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language
Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language
arrow icon