Retail Case Update: David and Goliath: Who is Entitled to Costs?
March 2, 2020
Our Retail Case Updates are intended to assist you in staying current with new case law and emerging legal issues in this area.
Co-authored by Kim Yee and Jaeda Lee, the March edition of the Retail Case Law Update discusses a recent Ontario case, Przyk v. Hamilton Retirement Group Ltd., 2019 ONSC 7498 where an insurer successfully defended a personal injury claim, but the court refused to award costs in their favour.
Read the update here.
Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 16, 2024.
Related
Subscribe