![“In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/aynsley-severide_thumbnail-e1708632065959.jpg)
Select Language
Disclaimer: Translations of the content on this website are provided by Google Translate. We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or appropriateness of the translated text. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated content, please refer to the original version of the content in English.
Posts tagged Appeals
Visit our Knowledge Centre for more searching.
![“In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/AdobeStock_693454090.jpeg)
![“In approaching assertions of Cabinet confidentiality, administrative decision makers and reviewing courts must be attentive not only to the vital importance of public access to government-held information but also to Cabinet secrecy’s core purpose of enabling effective government, and its underlying rationales of efficiency, candour, and solidarity.” – Justice Karakatsanis writing for the majority](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/aynsley-severide_thumbnail-e1708632065959.jpg)
![The Respondent, a pharmacist, had his license cancelled by the Appellant College of Pharmacists. The pharmacist successfully appealed this decision to a judge of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench. The College was unsuccessful in appealing the judge’s decision to the Manitoba Court of Appeal](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/pharmacist_thumbnail.jpg)
![The Respondent, a pharmacist, had his license cancelled by the Appellant College of Pharmacists. The pharmacist successfully appealed this decision to a judge of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench. The College was unsuccessful in appealing the judge’s decision to the Manitoba Court of Appeal](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/scott-marcinkow_thumbnail.jpg)
September 27, 2023
![Judicial Review of Business Licensing Decision](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/signing-paper_thumbnail.jpg)
![Judicial Review of Business Licensing Decision](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ellie-einarson_thumbnail-2.jpg)
January 17, 2023
![Court of Appeal agrees it was not patently unreasonable for BC Human Rights Tribunal to summarily dismiss appellant’s discrimination complaint following his termination for using dating apps to hook up with male students on campus where he worked](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/supreme-court-bc_thumbnail.jpg)
![Court of Appeal agrees it was not patently unreasonable for BC Human Rights Tribunal to summarily dismiss appellant’s discrimination complaint following his termination for using dating apps to hook up with male students on campus where he worked](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/kara-hill_thumbnail.jpg)
November 15, 2022
![Small claims action dismissed after claimant’s failure to appear at settlement conference due to not seeing the notice of settlement conference in the mail during its COVID-related closure. Application to set that dismissal order aside was brought several months later and dismissed due to claimant’s lack of diligence](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/professional-regulation.jpg)
![Small claims action dismissed after claimant’s failure to appear at settlement conference due to not seeing the notice of settlement conference in the mail during its COVID-related closure. Application to set that dismissal order aside was brought several months later and dismissed due to claimant’s lack of diligence](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/kara-hill_thumbnail.jpg)
November 15, 2022
![Alberta Court of Appeal finds that the words “the Mortgagee” in standard mortgage clause in homeowner’s policy, while ambiguous, do not mean the actual mortgagee in circumstances where the insurer was misled about the actual lender and had no knowledge of same](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/white-house_thumbnail.jpg)
![Alberta Court of Appeal finds that the words “the Mortgagee” in standard mortgage clause in homeowner’s policy, while ambiguous, do not mean the actual mortgagee in circumstances where the insurer was misled about the actual lender and had no knowledge of same](https://www.harpergrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/tricia-milne_thumbnail-2.jpg)
September 13, 2022